<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Hamilton &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bdhamilton.com/tag/blogging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/blogging-2-0?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=blogging-2-0</link>
		<comments>http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/blogging-2-0#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bdhamilton.com/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura McKenna&#8217;s take on the current state of blogging (via Adam Kotsko), especially the bit on the decline of linking culture among weblogs, seems to me, too, quite apt. But I would add that part of the reason for the shift is probably also a change in the way people tend to read blogs. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.apt11d.com/2009/07/the-blogosphere-20.html">Laura McKenna&#8217;s take on the current state of blogging</a> (via <a href="http://heteronomy.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/blog-anniversary/">Adam Kotsko</a>), especially the bit on the decline of linking culture among weblogs, seems to me, too, quite apt. But I would add that part of the reason for the shift is probably also a change in the way people tend to <em>read</em> blogs. I get my miscellaneous interesting links almost exclusively from Facebook now (and, I suppose, from <a href="http://kottke.org/">Kottke</a>); blogs I read for the <em>commentary</em>. If a blog posts very many links with only a sentence or two of commentary, as happened much more commonly in the old days, it&#8217;s off my reader almost immediately. The same goes for the theoblogging equivalent: blockquote after blockquote from whatever random thinker one happens to be reading that day. I don&#8217;t think my habits are terribly uncommon on this point.</p>

<p>As readers have looked to blogs more and more for substance, and not just links, the burden to &#8216;be fresh&#8217; has grown proportionately. A link and a parroted word of approval, even with a word or two of elaboration, generally falls on deaf ears. (Interestingly, though, McKenna&#8217;s original post has spawned quite of few posts in just this genre [<a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/07/the-decline-of-blogging.php">1</a>, <a href="http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/07/when_blogs_were_young.php">2</a>, <a href="http://inmedias.blogspot.com/2009/07/laura-explains-blogosphere-at-present.html">3</a>]&#8211;just like it would have in 2002!)</p>

<p>The social web has grown up, and blogging has changed along with it. To keep the old linking culture alive, what we need now is to maintain blogging as a <em>conversational medium</em> more than simply a broadcasting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/blogging-2-0/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

