Brian Hamilton-Vise

I know that what I am asking is impossible. But in our time, as in every time, the impossible is the least that one can demand. —James Baldwin

The accusation of assumption

I’ve been noticing more and more often–and finding it more and more frustrating–that thinkers frequently dismiss their opponents by saying they “assume” such-and-such. That person assumes an antiquated metaphysics; this person assumes a sectarian view of the world. The Gospel of John assumes a middle Platonic philosophy; Anselm assumes a sacrificial economy of salvation. Obviously, everyone does have assumptions and it can be important to bring them to the surface of an argument. But frequently it’s not a matter of blind assumption at all, but a self-conscious decision to occupy this or that intellectual space. Anselm’s whole book is actually an argument for understanding salvation in terms of a certain kind of sacrifice. To relegate someone’s position to the status of an assumption is just a way of avoiding the work of really engaging their position, and relying instead on a repulsion to that position the author hopes is already instinctual in the reader (or wants to nurture).

21 October 2008 | Comments (0)
Tags:

[RSS for this post]

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Brian Hamilton-Vise is a Ph.D. student in moral theology at the University of Notre Dame, where his research is in the history of Christian political and economic thought. His side interests are in the development of negative theology and in recent political theory. Email him at bdhamilton@gmail.com.

[Subscribe to RSS Feed]  Subscribe to my RSS feed

Recent bookmarks