Comments on: For reading http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/for-reading?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=for-reading Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:17:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: katie http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/for-reading/comment-page-1#comment-6499 katie Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:39:21 +0000 http://www.bdhamilton.com/?p=604#comment-6499 <p>word.</p> word.

]]> By: Brian Hamilton http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/for-reading/comment-page-1#comment-6496 Brian Hamilton Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:06:31 +0000 http://www.bdhamilton.com/?p=604#comment-6496 <p>Seriously! I've been sitting here for quite a while now trying to figure out what that book is even actually saying about the declension of adjectives.</p> Seriously! I’ve been sitting here for quite a while now trying to figure out what that book is even actually saying about the declension of adjectives.

]]> By: Michael Rubbelke http://www.bdhamilton.com/articles/for-reading/comment-page-1#comment-6495 Michael Rubbelke Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:20:18 +0000 http://www.bdhamilton.com/?p=604#comment-6495 <p>This is so true.</p> <p>And if you're using "Jannach's," the pedagogically challenged text only further confuses the temporary retention.</p> This is so true.

And if you’re using “Jannach’s,” the pedagogically challenged text only further confuses the temporary retention.

]]>