<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wet lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/comment-page-1#comment-3836</link>
		<dc:creator>wet lenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdhamilton.com/?page_id=372#comment-3836</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;on man-made law rather than religious doctrine.  It&#039;s often missed that secular is a Christian idea, straight out of Augustine, who coined the word &#039;saeculum&#039; to mean the present age where the two cities always interpenetrate until the eschaton.Brian Hamiltonexplains: Augustine secularizes the world and the church alike, divesting them of the absolute or final significance which either has only eschatologically. The Roman Empire is not identical with the earthly city, and the Church, though it can be&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--%kramer-pre%-->on man-made law rather than religious doctrine.  It&#8217;s often missed that secular is a Christian idea, straight out of Augustine, who coined the word &#8216;saeculum&#8217; to mean the present age where the two cities always interpenetrate until the eschaton.Brian Hamiltonexplains: Augustine secularizes the world and the church alike, divesting them of the absolute or final significance which either has only eschatologically. The Roman Empire is not identical with the earthly city, and the Church, though it can be<!--%kramer-post%-->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fire and the Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/comment-page-1#comment-3837</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fire and the Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdhamilton.com/?page_id=372#comment-3837</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;The failure of the war on drugs&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--%kramer-pre%-->The failure of the war on drugs<!--%kramer-post%-->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ochlophobist</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/comment-page-1#comment-3838</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ochlophobist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdhamilton.com/?page_id=372#comment-3838</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;a review done by Brian Hamilton&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--%kramer-pre%-->a review done by Brian Hamilton<!--%kramer-post%-->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith and Theology</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/comment-page-1#comment-3839</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith and Theology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdhamilton.com/?page_id=372#comment-3839</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;for boosting blog traffic. (If I win the prize, I’ll donate it to a reader of F&amp;T.)  Peter Leithart has a nice quote from Pamuk on “why we fall in love with only a few books in a lifetime.” And Brian isabsolutely rightto defend the importance of theological polemics: “Are not such oppositions entirely necessary, in order to demonstrate the kinds of decision (rather than syncretism) that conversion entails?”  Daniel Philpott&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--%kramer-pre%-->for boosting blog traffic. (If I win the prize, I’ll donate it to a reader of F&amp;T.)  Peter Leithart has a nice quote from Pamuk on “why we fall in love with only a few books in a lifetime.” And Brian isabsolutely rightto defend the importance of theological polemics: “Are not such oppositions entirely necessary, in order to demonstrate the kinds of decision (rather than syncretism) that conversion entails?”  Daniel Philpott<!--%kramer-post%-->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ironic Catholic</title>
		<link>http://www.bdhamilton.com/archive/comment-page-1#comment-3840</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ironic Catholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdhamilton.com/?page_id=372#comment-3840</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Augustine&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--%kramer-pre%-->Augustine<!--%kramer-post%-->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

